Talk:Nightmare Amalgam

This card does not appear in lists of minions with subtypes(e.g. list of beasts). Then I browsed the history of page "Data:Cards/Nightmare Amalgam(89353)", and noticed that many of us had tried, but nothing worked. Seems that it is impossible to work it out using the current template, and we have to accept multiple keywords in "Subtype". 183.172.112.70 12:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Li2CO3
 * I think it's fine to just leave in the All category and cut everything else, especially if Blizzard ever adds more All minions. It'll get a bit noisy if there's a bunch of minions of every subtype page. TheMurlocAggroB (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * It’s not likely that they’ll add that many All minions. Your solution is to not have a solution for an actual problem for the sole reason that maybe in the future it could be annoying to maintain if they add more minions or subtypes? That’s lame. We have a problem right now. You’re worried about potential problems that might never come up and likely wouldn’t be that big a deal.NotBrendon (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

For now, I lean towards just listing "All" minions with the "All" minion type rather than all their implied minion types. There is only one "All-type" minion right now, and the average player should just know that an "All" type exists, and think about this minion whenever they look at minion tables. However, If the Hearthstone team comes up with multi-minion-type minions, like dual-minion-type minions, then this will become a necessary question to deal with (not looking forward to that day though). Aegonostic (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)