Talk:Uncollectable

Duplicate page
Shouldn't the contents on this page be combined with the content on Uncollectible ? BigHugger (talk) 13:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I can't believe we have two pages, called Uncollectible and Uncollectible. "Uncollectible" separates cards by type (Minion, Spell, Weapon, Hero Power), while "Uncollectable" separates by class. I'm in favor of moving this page to something like Uncollectable (by class) or Uncollectible/by class or something similar. :\ Aegonostic (talk) 14:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Ohh, this page was just created today. Aegonostic (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I actually liked this page, the breakdown of uncollectibles by class. Aegonostic (talk) 00:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry, shoulda checked talk page first - ironically I spent a lot more time thinking about this user's other new page, which nobody commented on :) As I mentioned in the edit note, all the card tables are already class-sortable so I think manually breaking it down that way is not so useful. You're free to add such a page - integrated a little better and not misspelled, of course - remember you can go back to an old revision of this page and edit it to copy its wikitext if you want. I would lean toward the Uncollectible/by class naming personally, but then again I would lean toward not spending that much effort on making redundant top-down uncollectible lists anyway :P&#32;- jerodast (talk) 00:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Mainly, it wasn't clear to me that the editor even intended to duplicate this information with a different categorization style; more likely was that they searched for the misspelled name, didn't find it, assumed the page didn't exist and threw one together using the class page listings as a source. So, adding the redirect to prevent further search failure seemed most important.&#32;- jerodast (talk) 01:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Yea, I will think about this some more, on whether sorting by class is worth creating another article for. It probably would not be very notable, but it does make an entertaining page to look at. Aegonostic (talk) 03:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)